On June 5, 2026, Chief Judge John J. McConnell of the United States District Court for Rhode Island vacated USCIS-enacted policies that were known as the 39 country pause on adjudication of immigration benefits: the Benefits Hold Policy, the Global Asylum Hold Policy, the Comprehensive Re-Review Policy, and the Country-Specific Factors Policy. These policies were another attempt by the Administration to restrict legal immigration. The Decision is a win not just for intending immigrants, but for the Rule of Law.
From the Court’s decision
In his Decision, Chief Judge McConnell wrote:
“In ruling on these motions, the Court is reminded of a line often repeated in discussions around immigration policy: If people wish to immigrate to the United States, they ought to ‘follow the law’ and ‘do things the right way.’ This case serves as a perfect example of immigrants doing just that. Plaintiffs and their members have observed the legal processes that Congress enacted by statute and USCIS promulgated by regulation so that they may one day obtain immigration benefits. They have, for example, filed the appropriate paperwork, paid the required filing fees, submitted to the requested biometrics collections, and attended the necessary in-person interviews. Even so, Plaintiffs and their members are stuck waiting, for months on end, for benefit requests that USCIS refuses to adjudicate.
“But the rule of law has to apply to everyone equally and, as evident here, USCIS has neither ‘followed the law’ nor ‘done things the right way.’ Indeed, the agency has violated the very immigration laws that Congress has charged it with administering, as well as the administrative laws that govern the agency’s actions. In enacting its latest immigration policies, USCIS: claims statutory and regulatory authority that it does not possess; makes decisions without the reasoned explanations that it must provide; acts without regard for the reliance interests of applicants that it must consider; and justifies its actions with pretextual concerns of ‘national security’ that mask anti-immigrant sentiments that it is forbidden from letting influence its decision-making. In legal terms that means USCIS’s actions are contrary to law and arbitrary and capricious.
“Accordingly, as set forth below, each of the Challenged Policies that USCIS enacted—the Benefits Hold Policy, the Global Asylum Hold Policy, the Comprehensive Re-Review Policy, and the Country-Specific Factors Policy—are declared unlawful and are vacated and set aside.”
What this means going forward
The Government may appeal the Decision, but you should not assume that it would be a successful appeal, given the stated basis for the Decision. If it is upheld, we may see a decision from a Federal Court on the challenges to the pause on immigrant visa issuance for 75 countries issued by the Administration.
So, if you are a citizen or national of one of the 39 countries affected by the pause and have a petition or application for immigration benefits pending—such as asylum, work authorization, lawful permanent residence, or any other immigration benefit—you should consult an experienced immigration attorney to take action on your behalf now.
The 39 countries affected by the now-vacated pause
Antigua and Barbuda, Cuba, Dominica, Haiti, Venezuela, Afghanistan, Iran, Laos, Libya, Myanmar (Burma), Palestinian Authority, Syria, Turkmenistan, Tonga, Yemen, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gabon, The Gambia, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
Direct line: (561) 368-1008 · Monday through Friday, 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern. The first call is free. When you call, you reach me directly.
Roberta M. Deutsch
Boca Raton immigration attorney · 30+ years
Florida Bar #743828
(561) 368-1008